Google Fonts violates the GDPR, LG Munich, 20.01.2022

Marc Wag­ner

Febru­ary 3, 2022

2 min read|

Accor­ding to a recent ruling by the LG Munich, the use of Goog­le Fonts via the Con­tent Deli­very Net­work (CDN) vio­la­tes the GDPR, as the IP address of the visi­tor is trans­fer­red to the USA wit­hout being asked.

On Janu­ary 20, 2022, the Munich Regio­nal Court ruled that the use of Goog­le Fonts via a CDN wit­hout the con­sent of the user con­sti­tu­tes a vio­la­ti­on of the GDPR (AZ 3 O 17493/20). The dis­clo­sure of the IP address con­sti­tu­tes a vio­la­ti­on of the gene­ral right of per­so­na­li­ty in the form of the right of infor­ma­tio­nal self-deter­­mi­na­­ti­on pur­su­ant to Sec­tion 823 (1) BGB.

Here you can find an artic­le on how to embed Goog­le Fonts local­ly into your Word­Press site in just 5 steps.

What are Google Fonts? #

Goog­le Fonts are fonts pro­vi­ded by Goog­le under the Apa­che licen­se (ver­si­on 2.0) for free use (see: https://fonts.google.com).

image
Goog­le Fonts Examp­les

Goog­le Fonts can be embedded local­ly or via a CDN. When embed­ding local­ly, the fonts are stored direct­ly on the ser­ver of the web­site as TTF, WOFF, WOFF2 etc. and embedded via CSS.

Alter­na­tively, Goog­le offers the dyna­mic inte­gra­ti­on of fonts via the Con­tent Deli­very Net­work (CDN). In this case, the font is loa­ded direct­ly from the Goog­le ser­ver as nee­ded. This is done on the cli­ent side by the visitor’s brow­ser. The IP address of the user is then also trans­mit­ted, which in turn vio­la­tes the DSGVO.

Why is the integration of Google Fonts a problem? #

In the pro­cee­dings befo­re the Munich Regio­nal Court, the ope­ra­tor had inte­gra­ted the Goog­le fonts dyna­mi­cal­ly via Google’s CDN wit­hout obtai­ning the con­sent of each visi­tor in advan­ce. The plain­ti­ff objec­ted to this and deman­ded an injunc­tion and dama­ges.

The verdict of the LG Munich #

The Munich Regio­nal Court upheld the action. The unaut­ho­ri­zed dis­clo­sure of the dyna­mic IP address to Goog­le vio­la­ted the gene­ral right of pri­va­cy in the form of the right of infor­ma­tio­nal self-deter­­mi­na­­ti­on. In addi­ti­on, the Munich Regio­nal Court award­ed the plain­ti­ff dama­ges in the amount of €100.

Sources: #

88e86fcb816eff22bc917094df2862d8dd5c0e978b333e6dd5f36f808990c261 96

Arti­kel von:

Marc Wag­ner

Hi Marc here. I’m the foun­der of Forge12 Inter­ac­ti­ve and have been pas­sio­na­te about buil­ding web­sites, online stores, appli­ca­ti­ons and SaaS solu­ti­ons for busi­nesses for over 20 years. Befo­re foun­ding the com­pa­ny, I alre­a­dy work­ed in publicly lis­ted com­pa­nies and acqui­red all kinds of know­ledge. Now I want to pass this know­ledge on to my cus­to­mers.

Hast du eine Fra­ge? Hin­ter­lass bit­te einen Kom­men­tar